![]() ![]() ![]() I will likely Craigslist in several days, so if interested beforehand just drop me a message." If I didn't want to mess with recordings after a track is laid, I'd probably still be using the hardware recorder. I really didn't want to invest in expensive interfaces, a larger computer and steep learning curve for like Pro Tools recording. I felt this set up was the best compromise between my previous hardware concept and going full blown pro software. I record thru input channels in my trustworthy Behringer mixer (ok, insert joke here), which has a USB out to the computer. The Audacity suffices in that, but offers much more flexibility post processing, which I like to tinker with (mainly adjusting fade ins,outs, track levels and some panning). I no longer needed more than one simultaneous stereo pair channel for recording since I'm done with the band thing, I think. You had to hook up cables, connect, transfer was slow, and somewhat confusing. I always transferred files to my computer for safekeeping, which is the part that I found tedious. I would need to look in the manual, but I think I could still save Wave files at 24 bit. It recorded at 24 bit from what I recall, but whittling down to CD was only possible at 16 bit of course. I made some nice synth recordings with it and used to record my band as well. The Tascam had more than adequate sound quality IMO. I now use Audacity, which is free and with a few plugins is very useful and fairly easy to use. "I haven't used the Tascam DP24 for nearly 2 years. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |